AI + provenance
Say what made it. Say what it proves.
The first image packs are AI-generated and human-curated. The starter marks are direct vector constructions developed with AI assistance and approved through human review.
No OpenAI service runs in the library. Browsing, customization, and downloads are static and local to the browser.
No builder content, portfolio text, or customization choice is sent to an image provider.
What “AI-generated and human-curated” means here
The image sources were generated from controlled text-only briefs, then selected, cropped, technically inspected, and approved by Portfolio Work Studio. The controlled production record preserves the provider, recorded model, exact source evidence, and review history. Public pages keep a concise creation and curation summary.
Editorial Assemblies includes one master where a local visual artifact was manually repaired during curation. That material edit is stated in its public provenance summary rather than hidden behind a broad “curated” label.
The vector marks follow a different path
Logo and favicon geometry is not raw raster output. The canonical SVGs were directly constructed from reviewed directions, use bounded semantic color slots, embed no fonts or external artwork, and passed human exact-output and small-size review.
AI assistance during concept development does not make the marks exclusive. It also does not perform trademark clearance.
What the public projection keeps
- stable resource and provenance IDs;
- the accurate creation classification;
- a concise human-curation or material-edit summary;
- review date, version, filenames, dimensions, formats, and hashes;
- approved crop relationships and honest-use guidance.
What stays private
- private generation prompts and rejected directions;
- discarded candidate and batch identifiers;
- provider and model fields, account details, and internal cost records;
- local filesystem paths and internal review notes;
- raw generation manifests that were never intended as public metadata.
Decoration cannot become evidence by placement
An abstract image can support a cover, background, placeholder, concept illustration, or presentation. It cannot document a real interface, user test, campaign, publication, commissioned building, photographed project, or client result that did not exist.
That distinction is portfolio-integrity guidance, not a condition placed on CC0. It is there because a polished portfolio should make authorship and evidence easier to understand.
Rights claims remain cautious
Provider terms, CC0 association, copyrightability, trademark, privacy, and factual truth are different questions. Portfolio Work Studio does not collapse them into a claim that it “owns all AI images,” and does not promise that an output is unique.
Read the CC0 and rights overview for the practical permissions and the separate rights that can still matter.